15-Hour Interrogation of Former President Yoon Suk-yeol and 110 National Policy Goals: Clash of Legal Disputes and Policy Visions

In the Dead of Night, Former President Yoon Seok-yeol Is Summoned

Have you ever imagined the highest power of a nation standing before the court? Former President Yoon Seok-yeol has been summoned for questioning on charges of rebellion and foreign exchange offenses, etching a new page in the history of South Korean politics.

On June 28, 2025, the night in Seoul was unlike any other. Yoon appeared at the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office to undergo the first interrogation by Special Prosecutor Joe Eun-seok’s team. Though he remained inside the building for a grueling 15 hours, the actual questioning lasted only five—a silence that felt like the calm before a storm.

Yoon’s legal team vocalized strong objections during this process. They criticized, "It is inappropriate for Commissioner Park Chang-hwan, who directed an illegal arrest, to investigate victims." This raised serious doubts about the fairness of the investigation and further highlighted the complexity surrounding the case.

What is particularly notable is that former President Yoon did not exercise his right to remain silent during this interrogation. This move can be seen as a deliberate effort to actively present his stance. Yet, how such a posture will influence the direction of the ongoing investigation remains uncertain.

This summons transcends a mere legal procedure; it could become a pivotal turning point in South Korea’s political history. The fact that a former president is being questioned on charges of rebellion and foreign offenses poses many questions for our society. We are compelled once again to reflect deeply on the meaning of the rule of law, the accountability of power, and the realization of justice.

Former President Yoon’s summons is not the end, but merely the beginning. With a second interrogation scheduled for June 30 and the investigation still unfolding, it is our collective responsibility to watch closely how these developments unfold—and what impact they will have on our society.

15 Hours vs. 5 Hours: The Prelude to the Truth Battle Over Former President Yoon Suk-yeol’s Investigation

Amid 15 hours of tense wait, only 5 hours of actual investigation took place. And the controversy that the ‘perpetrator is investigating the victim’ adds yet another layer. What do all these fragments of truth surrounding former President Yoon Suk-yeol really reveal?

On June 28, 2025, former President Yoon Suk-yeol underwent his first questioning by Special Prosecutor Jo Eun-seok’s team concerning charges of insurrection and foreign exchange offenses. Spending a staggering 15 hours at the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office, it was later disclosed that the actual interrogation lasted merely 5 hours, stirring widespread suspicion.

During this process, Yoon’s legal representatives voiced sharp criticism. Their claim that “Chief Superintendent Park Chang-hwan, who orchestrated the illegal arrest, is the wrong party to be interrogating the victim” raised serious doubts about the fairness of the investigation.

However, a notable point is that Yoon Suk-yeol did not exercise his right to remain silent during this interview. This suggests his active cooperation with the investigation and fuels anticipation for a second round of questioning.

In this charged atmosphere, public reactions are mixed and complex. Expressions like "stunned into disbelief" encapsulate the anger and disappointment, while others accuse Yoon’s camp of employing a “gaslighting” strategy, demanding that the investigation proceed swiftly.

The stark gap between 15 hours and 5 hours, the blurred lines between perpetrator and victim, and the choice not to invoke the right to silence—all these intertwined elements set the stage for a fierce battle over the truth surrounding former President Yoon Suk-yeol. As the investigation unfolds, eyes remain keenly fixed on what new revelations will surface and how this case will impact the course of Korean political history.

From 'Common Sense' to 'Global Leadership' – The Bright and Dark Sides of the Yoon Suk-yeol Government’s 110 Major Tasks

Launched under the banner of a "communicative president and a competent government," the Yoon Suk-yeol administration laid out its ambitious 110 national agenda. How are these bold plans being evaluated today? Let’s take a close look at the policy’s highlights and shadows.

Restoring Common Sense: The Pros and Cons of Real Estate Policy

The Yoon government promised to recalibrate real estate policies with "common sense" as the key focus. Yet, reality proved challenging.

• Bright Side: Attempts to revitalize the market through regulatory easing
• Dark Side: Decrease in actual transactions due to rising interest rates, ongoing housing insecurity among ordinary citizens

Economic Dynamism: The Challenges of Private-Led Growth

Emphasizing private-sector-led growth to secure economic dynamism, the government faced unforeseen hurdles.

• Bright Side: Efforts to improve the business environment through deregulation reforms
• Dark Side: Growth slowdown amid global economic downturn and inflation pressures

Social Integration: The Dual Facets of Youth Policies

What outcomes have efforts toward social integration—focusing on support for marginalized groups and strengthened youth policies—yielded?

• Bright Side: Expanded housing support for young people, promotion of job creation policies
• Dark Side: Insufficient improvement in actual youth unemployment rates, persistence of intergenerational conflicts

Future Innovation: The Current State of Science and Technology Investment

Highlighting increased investment in science and technology alongside achieving carbon neutrality, how has the Yoon administration fared?

• Bright Side: Boosted R&D budgets, proactive renewable energy policies
• Dark Side: Concerns about weakened long-term innovation momentum due to a focus on short-term achievements

Global Leadership: The Diplomatic Dilemma

Trying to capture two rabbits at once—the protection of liberal democratic values and normalization of inter-Korean relations—how has the Yoon government’s diplomacy been rated?

• Bright Side: Strengthening of the South Korea–U.S. alliance, active engagement on the global stage
• Dark Side: Strained North Korea ties, increasing diplomatic friction with neighboring countries

The Yoon Suk-yeol government’s 110 major national tasks painted an ambitious blueprint but have bumped into harsh realities. To truly embody the slogan of a “communicative president and a competent government,” more effort and time appear necessary. As the administration moves forward through its remaining term, all eyes are on how it will respond to public expectations and deliver real change.

Anger and Turmoil: The Current State of Public Sentiment Toward Former President Yoon Suk-yeol

The phrase "struck dumb with astonishment" is heating up the media landscape. This expression, vividly capturing the public’s emotions directed at former President Yoon Suk-yeol, sharply reflects the mood permeating South Korean society today. What exactly has ignited such widespread anger among the people?

A Tidal Wave of Overwhelming Anger

As the special prosecutor’s investigation into former President Yoon unfolds, public outrage is intensifying day by day. The revelation that he spent 15 hours at the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office but was questioned for only five hours has led many to question the investigation’s sincerity.

The Meaning Behind "Struck Dumb with Astonishment"

The phrase "struck dumb with astonishment" goes beyond mere anger; it embodies the deep shock and disappointment felt by the public. This single term encapsulates the complex emotions surrounding the unprecedented situation of a former president being investigated for charges of rebellion.

Signs of Erosion Within the Ruling Party’s Support Base

Even more striking is the gradual erosion of support within the People Power Party, the ruling party. This suggests that the controversies surrounding former President Yoon extend beyond personal issues, signaling a shift in the political landscape.

The Complexity of Public Sentiment

The public’s emotions cannot be reduced to anger alone. Feelings of disappointment, disillusionment, and betrayal intertwine in a complex web. Especially telling is the gap between the Yoon administration’s slogan—“A president who communicates, a government that works”—and the current reality, which has only deepened the public’s conflicted feelings.

Public emotions surrounding former President Yoon Suk-yeol have never been more charged. As the special prosecutor’s findings unfold and political reverberations follow, all eyes are on how these developments will shape the nation's collective mood going forward.

The Court's Verdict and Yoon Seok-yeol's Future

The special prosecutor's decision, the people's choice, and history's judgment. At all these crossroads, what fate will the political future of former President Yoon Seok-yeol ultimately face?

The legal battles surrounding former President Yoon Seok-yeol will mark a critical turning point that could determine his political life. The special prosecutor's investigation results into the charges of rebellion and foreign exchange violations will not just shape one man's destiny but will inscribe a significant chapter in South Korea's political history.

The Direction of the Special Prosecutor's Investigation

As the special prosecutor's team continues its probe, Yoon Seok-yeol's position is becoming increasingly precarious. The first 15-hour-long interrogation followed by a second summons underscores the gravity of the case. Should the special prosecutor's final conclusion work against Yoon, his political comeback could become virtually impossible.

The Public's Opinion

Equally important as the court's judgment is the public's evaluation. The outrage expressed as “dumbfounded disbelief” by the people could become a major obstacle to Yoon's political future. Even his base supporters within the People Power Party are diminishing, further shrinking his political foothold.

Evaluating the Policy Legacy

The achievements of the 110 national agenda tasks pursued during Yoon's administration will also be a vital factor in determining his future. How effectively goals like “restoring common sense” and “economic dynamism” were realized, and the public's assessment of these efforts, will serve as key indicators of his potential political revival.

History's Judgment

Ultimately, Yoon's political legacy will be judged by history. The combination of his accomplishments during his tenure and the outcomes of ongoing legal disputes will decide the place he occupies in South Korea's political annals.

Former President Yoon Seok-yeol's future remains uncertain. The results of the special prosecutor's investigation, the public sentiment, and the evaluation of his policies will collectively determine his fate. As a figure who once drew a significant line in Korean politics, the conclusion to Yoon's political journey is a story we must continue to watch closely.